by Steven Harris
Of the questions that get referred to me from our advice centres, one that has become a regular is: ‘Should (and how do I) go off grid?’.
Sometimes this is because of a misunderstanding that microgeneration means you have to be off grid (it doesn’t). Mainly, though, the question is being asked by people who want to opt out totally from our fossil-fuelled energy infrastructure.
For those of you out there who are dreaming of energy independence, here are some musings.
The first thing I’d say is, what are your motives? In the backwoods of America, or the depths of rural India, off-grid might be your only energy option – since ‘on-grid’ means ‘no grid’ in some parts of the world. (This has led to these places leading the rest of us in microgeneration, it’s the only economic local energy option.)
For the rest of us, though, if you have the grid and choose not to connect, your real result might not be quite what you intended. Yes, you will have opted out of a fossil-fuelled infrastructure for your day-to-day power, but unless you have invented some way to store that power, you will also have opted the fossil-fuelled world out of your lovely surplus renewable energy.
One of the reasons why grid-connected renewable electricity generation is so useful is because anything you can’t use can be squirted back along the wires back into the grid for other people to use. This means that every ray of sunshine that falls on your PV panels can be usefully harvested and put to work.
By contrast, solar thermal systems, although they are very useful, are always ‘off-grid’, and can only heat up a tank of hot water and no more. Unless you use that hot water before the sun goes down, any further sun is of no use and any further harvest has to be… well… dumped.
But if you were to go off-grid for electric, what would you need?
First, you’d need a cupboard full of batteries. This is your electrical version of a hot water cylinder. If you were in India or Africa (or a van or a narrow boat), and were only after a few hours of small power in the evening, this might just be a few car batteries. For your full 21st century home and lifestyle, we are talking serious purpose-made deep-cycle power cells, often with military backgrounds.
Second, you’d need a means of generating electricity. This can be solar PV, wind turbines, micro hydro and then (essentially), a diesel generator.
And third, you’d need a means of managing and controlling all of this kit so it would be able to give you the sort of power you want, when you want it.
Easy, I hear you say? Well, not really! Get it wrong and your batteries will soon be pining for the fiords, and these sort of batteries don’t come cheap. In fact, the batteries are likely to be the most expensive part of your installation – even more expensive than your PV panels. Also (and this is the killer), you would be doing very well if you got back 70% of the power you put in.
As with mobile phones and the laptops of old, if you abuse your batteries by (say) using them down to the bottom of their charge, or worse still, never letting them charge up completely, soon they will not hold charge, or will hold it okay, but only let you have it back at a trickle. (Those of you with old cordless drills will know what I mean here.)
This is why it is rare to find your backwoods homesteader without also a diesel gennie. This isn’t so much that they can’t rely on renewable energy for their power, it’s more for their battery maintenance regime. They need the gennie so they can do things like ‘equalise the charge’, ‘final float charge’ and ‘fizz off impurities’. Things for which you need an easily ‘turn-on-and-offable’ power source.
So you can see this route isn’t for the fainthearted (let alone the faint-walleted).
So let’s look at on-grid instead.
With electricity from the grid, you don’t have to worry about storing power because anything you don’t use in your home can be pushed back through your meter and down the wires into the local grid. The local grid is practically always hungry for power and will gobble it up in your neighbours’ houses and the community infrastructure.
So not only will you be spared the expense of batteries, your nearest and dearest will be spared your turning into a battery bore. (If you don’t believe this is inevitable, try reading a few articles from Homepower magazine).
But the main point is that the grid isn’t just something you take electricity from. You can actually give some back. By doing so, you’re helping those who for whatever reason can’t install their own solar panels, avoiding waste, and contributing to the decarbonisation of the grid. In other words, not just avoiding the problem, but contributing to the solution.
And if that wasn’t touchy-feely enough, here’s one last ‘pro-grid’ idea to leave you with. From afar, you could be excused for mistaking a solar power farm for a housing estate, only there are no houses underneath the panels. The builders end up having to build ‘grid infrastructure’ to take the power away to where it can be used. How daft is that? If you built the housing estate under the solar farm, (or put panels on the roofs of housing), the infrastructure would already be there to take the power and you might be able to make use of some of that power before sending off what you didn’t use to supply the world with sustainable renewable power.
Any more questions? Our advice line can help you find the best low-carbon solution for your property. Ring 0800 512 012.


Good summary. I moderate at fieldlines.com and just in the last couple of days have been making the point again that while I’m all for microgeneration (I have 5kWp of PV above my head for example), off-grid is expensive (which is why most of us that can choose to be on it). Your point about not having to waste excess is why I have indeed done PV first: I may do thermal on replacing our gas combi with a heat pump, but even then I’ll size it so as to almost never have an excess to dump even in mid-summer, so I’m never ‘wasting’ what I could share to reduce fossil-fuel consumption elsewhere on the grid…
Rgds
Damon
Steve replies:
Hi Damon,
Actually, I think (and this is a personal view) that solar thermal should be oversized. I have 64 solar tubes above my head and in the summer they can produce 4.6kW nearly all day long. That’s why I know all about heat dumping. My long term plan is to plumb in an aluminium radiator in the glycol circuit out on the roof with an auto heat dump valve which operates at 95Deg. At the moment the children occasionally have to have a hot filled paddling pool (whether they like it or not).
But it is not the summer I am concerned about, as I think I have a solution for that problem; it’s the winter.
In the winter, if the sun does deem to come out, my tubes can still give me over 3kW which I can run straight into my under floor heating. Some winter days they even overcome the thermostat on my other heating sources and the house becomes 100% solar heated.
But I’m currently being monitored and the monitoring people will soon tell me if my ‘personal’ view has borne fruit, or if I’m just a misguided tinkerer.
Steve
Steven, I can understand why you dislike off-grid energy – its not what you have been trained with, and you are afraid that it is “wierd” or marginal at best.
But actually there are many good reasons why ordinary people want to opt for a completely off-grid existence.
1. They actually want to disconnect from the whole corrupt energy industry with its hidden costs and surcharges. (And the same increasingly applies to the water industry)
2. They want to make do with far less energy than a “normal” household is supposed to have in the Western world
3. They are aware that as current rules stand in the event of a power cut you have to power down your renewable energy as well. The excuse made for this is safety, but actually that is specious.
So if you want to perpetuate the myth that you can somehow be ecological while at the same time maintaining the current huge energy consumption in a normal western home, then please go ahead. But increasingly people are seeing through this myth.
Having said all that, there are reasons why people who are currently on the grid would choose to keep a grid connection even though they are totally self-sufficient for energy and batteries. I call this being “off-grid ready” and I advocate it as the transition stage to go through on your way to being fully off-grid.
Off-grid storage can be such an immense pain in the rear! I have been preaching this for years but it can, at times, be so difficult to break through preconceived notions about grid-tying an on-site solar project.
Hi Nick,
Blog editor here. Nice to see you. Actually Steve in fact has experience of living off-grid, has built a zero-carbon home, is an eco-architect and knows his onions better than… well, most onion farmers. I think we’re just talking points of view here. We’re not saying anyone shouldn’t go off-grid; Steve merely pointed out that, in the interests of not wasting energy that could serve the community, being on the grid actually creates a mechanism for giving something back. This in turn helps to decarbonise the grid. And because the grid isn’t going anywhere in a hurry, we think this is a good idea.
We’re well in favour of microgeneration, which is after all decentralised energy – our series of field trials of renewable technology in action is helping to establish a baseline and make renewable energy more mainstream.
As for western lifestyles, the whole raison d’etre of the Energy Saving Trust is about helping people to use less energy – by installing efficiency measures in their homes, using better-designed products, changing the way they behave and even think about their homes. The amount of energy used in an average home in the UK is far less than in the USA, to start with – according to the US Energy Information Administration, about half – and we are working to reduce it further. We have to: we have a legally binding target to reduce our carbon emissions by 80% by the year 2050. But we’re starting from where people are, and how they live now. (Perhaps contrary to what people may think, carbon emissions per capita are much lower in cities!)
On another note, it’s really nice to see Carolyn Chute on your website; her book The Beans of Egypt, Maine was a huge favourite of mine!
Nick (hi again!),
I’d like to point out that my family uses something like 1/3 — 1/2 the typical UK household primary energy and we are roughly zero-carbon. We *are* trying to get to consumption levels that are sustainable but right now my grid connection means that I’m exporting over 1.5kW right now that I don’t have an immediate use for and that should avoid some coal or gas being burnt.
We’re on grid because it saves me £250k+ in batteries and is therefore a better use of resources (money and lead or lithium) for now. I’m still working on being completely off-grid for most of the year in suburbia…
Rgds
Damon
Steve: I have some Seebeck devices sitting unused on my desk to convert dumped thermal heat into electricity…
Anyhow, keep us posted on how your experiment works out.
Rgds
Damon